Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using augmentation in object programming" » "using argumentation in object programming" (Expand search), "using segmentation in object programming" (Expand search), "using augmentative in object programming" (Expand search), "using augmentation in subject programming" (Expand search), "using augmentation in objective programming" (Expand search), "using augmentation in content programming" (Expand search), "using augmentation _ object programming" (Expand search), "using pigmentation in object programming" (Expand search), "using augmentation an object programming" (Expand search), "using augmentation en object programming" (Expand search), "using augmentation and object programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using augmentation in object programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using augmentation in object programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using augmentation in object programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.