Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using augmentation and computation code" » "using argumentation and computation code" (Expand search), "using segmentation and computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentative and computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentation in computation code" (Expand search), "using augmentation and computational code" (Expand search), "using augmentation and computation model" (Expand search), "using augmentation and computation co" (Expand search), "using augmentation of computation code" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using augmentation and computation code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using augmentation and computation code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using augmentation and computation code ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using augmentation and computation code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.