Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using adaptation in reactive programming" » "using adaptation in objective programming" (Expand search), "using adaptation in teaching programming" (Expand search), "using adaptation in declarative programming" (Expand search), "nursing adaptation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "during adaptation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "using coaptation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "using adaptation and reactive programming" (Expand search), "using adaptation c reactive programming" (Expand search), "using adaptation by reactive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("using adaptation in reactive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"using adaptation in reactive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( using adaptation in reactive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("using adaptation in reactive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.