Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"these computation in coverage on" » "these computations in coverage on" (Expand search), "the computation in coverage on" (Expand search), "whose computation in coverage on" (Expand search), "these computation and coverage on" (Expand search), "these computation of coverage on" (Expand search), "these imputation in coverage on" (Expand search), "these computation in coverage of" (Expand search), "these computation in coverage in" (Expand search), "these computation in coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"these computation in coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( these computation in coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("these computation in coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.