Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"surface functionalities in object programming" » "surface functionalized in object programming" (Expand search), "surface functionality in object programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalization in object programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities of object programming" (Expand search), "surface functionals in object programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities in subject programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities in objective programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities in content programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities an object programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities en object programming" (Expand search), "surface functionalities and object programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("surface functionalities in object programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"surface functionalities in object programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( surface functionalities in object programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.