Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"practical implications in routine programming" » "practical application in routine programming" (Expand search), "clinical implications in routine programming" (Expand search), "practical implications in reactive programming" (Expand search), "practical implications in cone programming" (Expand search), "practical implications in line programming" (Expand search), "practical implications _ routine programming" (Expand search), "practical implications of routine programming" (Expand search), "practical applications in routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("practical implications in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"practical implications in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( practical implications in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("practical implications in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.