Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"pitch computation using objective programming" » "path computation using objective programming" (Expand search), "with computational using objective programming" (Expand search), "direct computation using objective programming" (Expand search), "pitch computations using objective programming" (Expand search), "pitch computation in objective programming" (Expand search), "pitch composition using objective programming" (Expand search), "pitch computation using subjective programming" (Expand search), "pitch computation single objective programming" (Expand search), "pitch computation using collective programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("pitch computation using objective programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"pitch computation using objective programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( pitch computation using objective programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.