Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"pitch computation in routine programming" » "pitch computation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "pitch computation in cone programming" (Expand search), "pitch computation in line programming" (Expand search), "path computation in routine programming" (Expand search), "with computational in routine programming" (Expand search), "direct computation in routine programming" (Expand search), "pitch computation and routine programming" (Expand search), "pitch computation of routine programming" (Expand search), "pitch imputation in routine programming" (Expand search), "pitch computation _ routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("pitch computation in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"pitch computation in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( pitch computation in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.