Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"path computation using physical programming" » "path computation using pascal programming" (Expand search), "path computation using logical programming" (Expand search), "path computation using graphical programming" (Expand search), "path computations using physical programming" (Expand search), "path computation in physical programming" (Expand search), "path composition using physical programming" (Expand search), "the computation using physical programming" (Expand search), "and computation using physical programming" (Expand search), "fast computation using physical programming" (Expand search), "path computation during physical programming" (Expand search), "path computation aging physical programming" (Expand search), "path computation among physical programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("path computation using physical programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"path computation using physical programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( path computation using physical programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.