Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"path computation using inductive programming" » "path computation using disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "path computation using objective programming" (Expand search), "path computation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "path computations using inductive programming" (Expand search), "path computation in inductive programming" (Expand search), "path composition using inductive programming" (Expand search), "the computation using inductive programming" (Expand search), "and computation using inductive programming" (Expand search), "fast computation using inductive programming" (Expand search), "path computation using inductively programming" (Expand search), "path computation using conductive programming" (Expand search), "path computation using reductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"path computation using inductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( path computation using inductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("path computation using inductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.