Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)
"modern coding using one sampling" » "modern housing using one sampling" (Expand search), "modern code using one sampling" (Expand search), "modern china using one sampling" (Expand search), "modern modeling using one sampling" (Expand search), "modern drying using one sampling" (Expand search), "modern coding using core sampling" (Expand search), "modern coding using line sampling" (Expand search), "modern coding using and sampling" (Expand search), "modern coding using cone sampling" (Expand search), "modern coding using on sampling" (Expand search), "modern coding using open sampling" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("modern coding using one sampling") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"modern coding using one sampling\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( modern coding using one sampling ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("modern coding using one sampling") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.