Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"modern coding efficiency computation in" » "modern coding efficiency computational in" (Expand search), "modern coding efficient computation in" (Expand search), "modern coding eficiency computations in" (Expand search), "modern feeding efficiency computation in" (Expand search), "modern cutting efficiency computation in" (Expand search), "modern spending efficiency computation in" (Expand search), "modern coding efficiency computation and" (Expand search), "modern coding efficiency computation of" (Expand search), "modern coding efficiency imputation in" (Expand search), "modern housing efficiency computation in" (Expand search), "modern code efficiency computation in" (Expand search), "modern china efficiency computation in" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("modern coding efficiency computation in") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"modern coding efficiency computation in\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( modern coding efficiency computation in ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("modern coding efficiency computation in") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.