Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"modeling computation sparse coverage in" » "modeling computational sparse coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling simulation sparse coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling notation sparse coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computational parser coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation scheme coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation tree coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation care coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation aware coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation large coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation sparse coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"modeling computation sparse coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( modeling computation sparse coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("modeling computation sparse coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.