Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"modeling computation reuse coverage in" » "modeling computational reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling simulation reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling notation reuse coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation nets coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation tree coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation the coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation rule coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation cusp coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation tube coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling computation reuse coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"modeling computation reuse coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( modeling computation reuse coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("modeling computation reuse coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.