Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"modeling annotation using coverage in" » "modeling notation using coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling innovation using coverage in" (Expand search), "modelling notation using coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling annotation in coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling adaptation using coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling annotation and coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling annotation using average in" (Expand search), "modeling annotation testing coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling annotation funding coverage in" (Expand search), "modeling annotation using coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"modeling annotation using coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( modeling annotation using coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("modeling annotation using coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.