Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"modeling annotation in routine programming" » "modeling notation in routine programming" (Expand search), "modeling innovation in routine programming" (Expand search), "modelling notation in routine programming" (Expand search), "modeling annotation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "modeling annotation in cone programming" (Expand search), "modeling annotation in line programming" (Expand search), "modeling annotation and routine programming" (Expand search), "modeling annotation of routine programming" (Expand search), "modeling annotation _ routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("modeling annotation in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"modeling annotation in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( modeling annotation in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("modeling annotation in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.