Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"modeling adaptation using reactive programming" » "modeling adaptation using objective programming" (Expand search), "modeling adaptation using teaching programming" (Expand search), "modeling adaptation using declarative programming" (Expand search), "model adaptation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "modeling adoption using reactive programming" (Expand search), "modeling lactation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "modeling adaptation and reactive programming" (Expand search), "modeling adaptation under reactive programming" (Expand search), "modeling adaptation using reductive programming" (Expand search), "modeling adaptation during reactive programming" (Expand search), "modeling adaptation using active programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"modeling adaptation using reactive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( modeling adaptation using reactive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("modeling adaptation using reactive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.