Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"mining computing using explosive programming" » "mining computing using inclusive programming" (Expand search), "mining computing using copositive programming" (Expand search), "mining computing using expression programming" (Expand search), "mining company using explosive programming" (Expand search), "mining computing ufcg explosive programming" (Expand search), "mining computing using exclusive programming" (Expand search), "mining computing in explosive programming" (Expand search), "mining computing point explosive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("mining computing using explosive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"mining computing using explosive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( mining computing using explosive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("mining computing using explosive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.