Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"mining computational code coverage from" » "combining computational code coverage from" (Expand search), "training computational code coverage from" (Expand search), "minimum computational code coverage from" (Expand search), "mining computational model coverage from" (Expand search), "mining computational cost coverage from" (Expand search), "mining computational models coverage from" (Expand search), "mining computational care coverage from" (Expand search), "mining computational and coverage from" (Expand search), "mining computational the coverage from" (Expand search), "mining computational code beverage from" (Expand search), "mining computational code coverage of" (Expand search), "mining computational code coverage on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("mining computational code coverage from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"mining computational code coverage from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( mining computational code coverage from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.