Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"lung functions using active programming" » "lung functions using reactive programming" (Expand search), "lung functions using octave programming" (Expand search), "lung functions using adaptive programming" (Expand search), "lung function using active programming" (Expand search), "lung reactions using active programming" (Expand search), "iung function using active programming" (Expand search), "scaling functions using active programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"lung functions using active programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( lung functions using active programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("lung functions using active programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.