Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in routine using generalized programming" » "in routine using generative programming" (Expand search), "in routine using general programming" (Expand search), "in routine using generalized hamming" (Expand search), "in routine in generalized programming" (Expand search), "in routine and generalized programming" (Expand search), "in routine on generalized programming" (Expand search), "in routing using generalized programming" (Expand search), "in route using generalized programming" (Expand search), "_ routine using generalized programming" (Expand search), "of routine using generalized programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"in routine using generalized programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( in routine using generalized programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("in routine using generalized programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.