Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in metacognition in computational code" » "in metacognition in computational model" (Expand search), "in metacognition in computational cost" (Expand search), "in metacognition in computational models" (Expand search), "and metacognition in computational code" (Expand search), "of metacognition in computational code" (Expand search), "1 metacognition in computational code" (Expand search), "in metacognition and computational code" (Expand search), "in metacognitivo _ computational code" (Expand search), "in metacognitiva _ computational code" (Expand search), "in metacognition _ computational code" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("in metacognition in computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"in metacognition in computational code\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( in metacognition in computational code ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("in metacognition in computational code") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.