Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in javascript based reactive programming" » "in javascript based objective programming" (Expand search), "in javascript based teaching programming" (Expand search), "in javascript based declarative programming" (Expand search), "in javascript and reactive programming" (Expand search), "in javascript code reactive programming" (Expand search), "in javascript cold reactive programming" (Expand search), "in javascript based refractive programming" (Expand search), "in javascript based proactive programming" (Expand search), "in javascript based active programming" (Expand search), "_ javascript based reactive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("in javascript based reactive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"in javascript based reactive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( in javascript based reactive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.