Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in javascript based negative programing" » "in javascript based reactive programing" (Expand search), "in javascript based generative programming" (Expand search), "in javascript based narrative programming" (Expand search), "in javascript and negative programing" (Expand search), "in javascript code negative programing" (Expand search), "in javascript cold negative programing" (Expand search), "in javascript base negativa programing" (Expand search), "in javascript based relative programing" (Expand search), "in javascript based generative programing" (Expand search), "_ javascript based negative programing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("in javascript based negative programing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"in javascript based negative programing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( in javascript based negative programing ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("in javascript based negative programing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.