Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in estimating embedded coder program" » "in estimation embedded coder program" (Expand search), "in estimating expected coder program" (Expand search), "in estimating embedded copper program" (Expand search), "in estimating embedded model program" (Expand search), "in estimating embedded power program" (Expand search), "_ estimating embedded coder program" (Expand search), "in estimating embedded cooper program" (Expand search), "in estimating embedded proder program" (Expand search), "in estimating embedded closer program" (Expand search)
"advanced python programming coding program" » "advanced python programming using program" (Expand search), "advanced python programming code program" (Expand search), "advanced python programming computing program" (Expand search), "advanced method programming coding program" (Expand search), "advanced path programming coding program" (Expand search), "advanced symphony programming coding program" (Expand search), "advanced python programming cloning program" (Expand search), "advanced python programming loading program" (Expand search), "advanced python programming cooling programs" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"in estimating embedded coder program\") OR (\"advanced python programming coding program\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( in estimating embedded coder program ) OR ( advanced python programming coding program ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("in estimating embedded coder program") OR ("advanced python programming coding program"))*.