Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"human computations using reactive programming" » "human computations using objective programming" (Expand search), "human computations using teaching programming" (Expand search), "human computations using declarative programming" (Expand search), "human computation using reactive programming" (Expand search), "human populations using reactive programming" (Expand search), "human mutations using reactive programming" (Expand search), "human computations in reactive programming" (Expand search), "human computations using reductive programming" (Expand search), "human computations during reactive programming" (Expand search), "human computations using active programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"human computations using reactive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( human computations using reactive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("human computations using reactive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.