Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"developing prediction using java programming" » "developing predictive using java programming" (Expand search), "developing appreciation using java programming" (Expand search), "developing partition using java programming" (Expand search), "developing prediction in java programming" (Expand search), "developing prediction and java programming" (Expand search), "developing prediction using and programming" (Expand search), "developing prediction using based programming" (Expand search), "developing prediction using goal programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("developing prediction using java programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"developing prediction using java programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( developing prediction using java programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.