Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"developing effective coding conic programming" » "developing effective coding logic programming" (Expand search), "developing effective coding cone programming" (Expand search), "developing effective coding convex programming" (Expand search), "developing effective coping conic programming" (Expand search), "developing effective dosing conic programming" (Expand search), "developing effective moving conic programming" (Expand search), "developing effective codina monica programming" (Expand search), "developing effective coding canine programming" (Expand search), "developing effective using conic programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("developing effective coding conic programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"developing effective coding conic programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( developing effective coding conic programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.