Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"developing computational time coverage in" » "applying computational time coverage in" (Expand search), "teaching computational time coverage in" (Expand search), "learning computational time coverage in" (Expand search), "developing computational tool coverage in" (Expand search), "developing computational code coverage in" (Expand search), "developing computational tools coverage in" (Expand search), "developing computational the coverage in" (Expand search), "developing computational live coverage in" (Expand search), "developing computational time average in" (Expand search), "developing computational time coverage of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("developing computational time coverage in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"developing computational time coverage in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( developing computational time coverage in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.