Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"developing computation using protocol in" » "developing computational using protocol in" (Expand search), "developing population using protocol in" (Expand search), "developing communication using protocol in" (Expand search), "developing computations using protocol in" (Expand search), "developing computation in protocol in" (Expand search), "developing composition using protocol in" (Expand search), "developing computation using protocols in" (Expand search), "developing computation nursing protocol in" (Expand search), "developing computation curing protocol in" (Expand search), "developing computation using protocol _" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("developing computation using protocol in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"developing computation using protocol in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( developing computation using protocol in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.