Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"developing computation in random programming" » "developing computational in random programming" (Expand search), "developing population in random programming" (Expand search), "developing communication in random programming" (Expand search), "developing computation in and programming" (Expand search), "developing computation in quantum programming" (Expand search), "developing computation in ranking programming" (Expand search), "developing computation and random programming" (Expand search), "developing computation of random programming" (Expand search), "developing imputation in random programming" (Expand search), "developing computation _ random programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"developing computation in random programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( developing computation in random programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("developing computation in random programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.