Talvez deva tentar algumas variações de ortografia:
"design implementation in routine programming" » "an implementation in routine programming" (Expandir a busca), "design implementation in reactive programming" (Expandir a busca), "design implementation in cone programming" (Expandir a busca), "design implementation in line programming" (Expandir a busca), "design implementation and routine programming" (Expandir a busca), "design implementation of routine programming" (Expandir a busca), "design implementation _ routine programming" (Expandir a busca)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using codigos python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using using python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using coding piton python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using coping python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using coating python python programming" (Expandir a busca), "using cooking python python programming" (Expandir a busca)

Você pode obter mais resultados ajustando o argumento de busca.

• Fazer uma busca fuzzy pode resultar em termos de grafias semelhantes: (("design implementation in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• As palavras AND, OR e NOT pode ocasionar problemas na busca; tente utilizar as aspas: "((\"design implementation in routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Remover as aspas pode possibilitar buscas mais amplas: (( design implementation in routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adicionar um caractere curinga pode recuperar variações da palavra buscada: (("design implementation in routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.