Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"design implementation in computing processing" » "an implementation in computing processing" (Expand search), "design implementation in coating processing" (Expand search), "design implementation in collating processing" (Expand search), "design implementation in complaint processing" (Expand search), "design implementation and computing processing" (Expand search), "design implementation of computing processing" (Expand search), "design implementation _ computing processing" (Expand search), "design implementation grid computing processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"design implementation in computing processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( design implementation in computing processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("design implementation in computing processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.