Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"deep convolutional coding coverage on" » "deep convolutional codes coverage on" (Expand search), "deep convolutional code coverage on" (Expand search), "deep convolutional long coverage on" (Expand search), "deep convolutional fading coverage on" (Expand search), "deep convolutional funding coverage on" (Expand search), "deep convolutional coding coverage of" (Expand search), "deep convolutional coding coverage in" (Expand search), "deep convolutional coding coverage and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"deep convolutional coding coverage on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( deep convolutional coding coverage on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("deep convolutional coding coverage on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.