Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"deep convolutional coding coverage in" » "deep convolutional codes coverage in" (Expand search), "deep convolutional code coverage in" (Expand search), "deep convolutional long coverage in" (Expand search), "deep convolutional fading coverage in" (Expand search), "deep convolutional funding coverage in" (Expand search), "deep convolutional coding coverage of" (Expand search)
"using using python python programming" » "using using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using using piton python programming" (Expand search), "using using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using usando python python programming" (Expand search), "using in python python programming" (Expand search), "using fusing python python programming" (Expand search), "housing using python python programming" (Expand search), "nursing using python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("deep convolutional coding coverage in") OR ("using using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"deep convolutional coding coverage in\") OR (\"using using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( deep convolutional coding coverage in ) OR ( using using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("deep convolutional coding coverage in") OR ("using using python python programming"))*.