Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding violation gnu octave programming" » "coding violation gnu stage programming" (Expand search), "coding violation gnu objective programming" (Expand search), "coding violation gnu reactive programming" (Expand search), "scaling violation gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "coding variation gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "coding solution gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "coding violation insu octave programming" (Expand search), "coding violation in octave programming" (Expand search), "coding violation and octave programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding violation gnu octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding violation gnu octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding violation gnu octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.