Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding relations in inductive programming" » "coding relations in disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coding relations in objective programming" (Expand search), "coding relations in reactive programming" (Expand search), "loving relations in inductive programming" (Expand search), "working relations in inductive programming" (Expand search), "scaling relations in inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding relations an inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding relations in inductively programming" (Expand search), "coding relations and inductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding relations in inductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding relations in inductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding relations in inductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.