Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"using implications on coding program" » "nursing implications on coding program" (Expand search), "aging implications on coding program" (Expand search), "running implications on coding program" (Expand search), "using implications of coding program" (Expand search), "using implications in coding program" (Expand search), "using implications _ coding program" (Expand search), "using implications on cloning program" (Expand search), "using implications on loading program" (Expand search), "using implications on cooling programs" (Expand search), "using implications non coding program" (Expand search), "using implications and coding program" (Expand search)
"coding orientation in coding program" » "coping orientation in coding program" (Expand search), "chain orientation in coding program" (Expand search), "counting orientations in coding program" (Expand search), "coding orientation and coding program" (Expand search), "coding orientation in cloning program" (Expand search), "coding orientation in loading program" (Expand search), "coding orientation in cooling programs" (Expand search), "coding orientation in decoding program" (Expand search), "coding orientation non coding program" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding orientation in coding program") OR ("using implications on coding program"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding orientation in coding program\") OR (\"using implications on coding program\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding orientation in coding program ) OR ( using implications on coding program )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coding orientation in coding program") OR ("using implications on coding program"))*.