Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding modulation in octave programming" » "coding modulation in stage programming" (Expand search), "coding modulation in objective programming" (Expand search), "coding modulation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "routing modulation in octave programming" (Expand search), "code modulation in octave programming" (Expand search), "coded modulation in octave programming" (Expand search), "coding modulation of octave programming" (Expand search), "coding modulation gnu octave programming" (Expand search), "coding modulation n octane programming" (Expand search), "coding modulation _ octave programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding modulation in octave programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding modulation in octave programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coding modulation in octave programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.