Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding generated by routine programming" » "coding generated by reactive programming" (Expand search), "coding generated by cone programming" (Expand search), "coding generated by line programming" (Expand search), "modeling generated by routine programming" (Expand search), "scribing generated by routine programming" (Expand search), "content generated by routine programming" (Expand search), "coding generated _ routine programming" (Expand search), "coding generated of routine programming" (Expand search), "coding generated in routine programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding generated by routine programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding generated by routine programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coding generated by routine programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.