Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding functions in linked programming" » "coding functions in line programming" (Expand search), "coding functions in linear programming" (Expand search), "coding functions in lineal programming" (Expand search), "scoring functions in linked programming" (Expand search), "voting functions in linked programming" (Expand search), "coping function in linked programming" (Expand search), "coding functions is linked programming" (Expand search), "coding functions n linked programming" (Expand search), "coding functions and linked programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding functions in linked programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding functions in linked programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding functions in linked programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.