Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding functions by biobjective programming" » "coding functions by objective programming" (Expand search), "coding functions by multiobjective programming" (Expand search), "coding functions by collective programming" (Expand search), "scoring functions by biobjective programming" (Expand search), "voting functions by biobjective programming" (Expand search), "coping function by biobjective programming" (Expand search), "coding functions _ biobjective programming" (Expand search), "coding functions by objectives programming" (Expand search), "coding functions and biobjective programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding functions by biobjective programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding functions by biobjective programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding functions by biobjective programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.