Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding function in linked programming" » "coding function in line programming" (Expand search), "coding function in linear programming" (Expand search), "coding function in lineal programming" (Expand search), "coding functions in linked programming" (Expand search), "coping function in linked programming" (Expand search), "crowding function in linked programming" (Expand search), "coding function is linked programming" (Expand search), "coding function n linked programming" (Expand search), "coding function and linked programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding function in linked programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding function in linked programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding function in linked programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.