Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding function and inductive programming" » "coding function and disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coding function and objective programming" (Expand search), "coding function and reactive programming" (Expand search), "coding functions and inductive programming" (Expand search), "coping function and inductive programming" (Expand search), "crowding function and inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding function an inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding function and inductively programming" (Expand search), "coding function and conductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding function and inductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding function and inductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding function and inductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.