Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding function and fragmented programming" » "coding function and fragment programming" (Expand search), "coding function and oriented programming" (Expand search), "coding function and agent programming" (Expand search), "coding functions and fragmented programming" (Expand search), "coping function and fragmented programming" (Expand search), "crowding function and fragmented programming" (Expand search), "coding function in fragmented programming" (Expand search), "coding function and augmented programming" (Expand search), "coding function _ fragmented programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding function and fragmented programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding function and fragmented programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding function and fragmented programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.