Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding estimation using implicit programming" » "coding estimation using light programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation using improve programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation using plant programming" (Expand search), "loading estimation using implicit programming" (Expand search), "fading estimation using implicit programming" (Expand search), "modeling estimation using implicit programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation in implicit programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation and implicit programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation using impact programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation using simplified programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding estimation using implicit programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding estimation using implicit programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding estimation using implicit programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.