Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding estimation in inductive programming" » "coding estimation in disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation in objective programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation in reactive programming" (Expand search), "loading estimation in inductive programming" (Expand search), "fading estimation in inductive programming" (Expand search), "modeling estimation in inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation of inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation an inductive programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation in inductively programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation and inductive programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding estimation in inductive programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding estimation in inductive programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coding estimation in inductive programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.