Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding estimation by active programming" » "coding estimation by reactive programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation by octave programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation by adaptive programming" (Expand search), "loading estimation by active programming" (Expand search), "fading estimation by active programming" (Expand search), "modeling estimation by active programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation of active programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation in active programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation _ active programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation by activated programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding estimation by active programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding estimation by active programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coding estimation by active programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.