Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding estimation based logical programming" » "coding estimation based logic programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation based goal programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation based conic programming" (Expand search), "loading estimation based logical programming" (Expand search), "fading estimation based logical programming" (Expand search), "modeling estimation based logical programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation and logical programming" (Expand search), "coding optimization based logical programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation by logical programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation based local programming" (Expand search), "coding estimation based topical programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding estimation based logical programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding estimation based logical programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coding estimation based logical programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.