Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coding detection using logical programming" » "coding detection using logic programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using goal programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using conic programming" (Expand search), "doping detection using logical programming" (Expand search), "fading detection using logical programming" (Expand search), "flooding detection using logical programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using local programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using topical programming" (Expand search), "coding detection using lexical programming" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coding detection using logical programming") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coding detection using logical programming\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coding detection using logical programming ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.